【论文速递】获评高被引学者会提升学术产出与影响力吗?——来自整体与个体层面的双重验证

摘要：获评高被引学者对科研人员来说具有一定的内生促进作用和外部光环效应,那么获评是否能够提升学者的生产力及影响力?如果可以,该积极影响是否普遍存在于绝大多数获奖研究人员?该论文利用科睿唯安数学学科高被引科学家的产出数据,从整体和个体层面考察了获评高被引学者与学术生产力和影响力的关系。根据高被引学者整体平均产出与个人产出时间序列曲线,论文分析了我国高被引学者的四种职业发展路径。研究发现获评高被引学者对科研人员的影响力具有一定的促进效应,数学学科研究人员获得高被引学者称号之后,论文的产出量不升反降,但论文影响力显著增加。

关键词：分段线性回归; 高被引学者; 学术发展路径; H指数

Abstract：The highly cited researchers have a certain endogenous promotion effect and exogenous halo effect for scholars. So does being accredited enhance the productivity and impact of academics?If so,is that positive impact prevalent among the vast majority of award-winning researchers?The paper examines the relationship between highly cited researchers and academic productivity and impact at both an aggregate and individual level,using output data from Clarivate Analytics mathematics disciplines' highly cited researchers. Based on the overall average output of highly cited researchers versus individual output time series curve,the paper analyzes four career paths of highly cited researchers in China. The study found that being rated as a highly cited researchers has a certain facilitating effect on the influence of researchers. After researchers in mathematical disciplines received the highly cited researcher designation,the output of the papers did not increase but decreased,but the impact of the papers increased significantly.

Key words：piecewise linear regression model; highlycited researchers; academic development path; H index

文章作者：刘红煦，唐莉

作者单位：同济大学图书馆

复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院

全文已刊发在《科学学研究》2021年第2期

关键词:

【论文速递】获评高被引学者会提升学术产出与影响力吗?——来自整体与个体层面的双重验证

标签